The justification exempting from punishment acts committed out of necessity to repel, proportionately, an unjust attack on oneself or another.
All termsSelf-defence justifies acts committed out of the necessity to repel an unjust attack that is occurring, or whose occurrence or repetition is certain. The attack may target any defensible right of the defender or of a third person.
Its conditions are twofold. As to the attack: it must be unjust and ongoing or imminent at the moment of defence; acting against an attack already over is retaliation, not defence. As to the defence: it must be proportionate to what repelling the attack requires, balancing the means used and the harm inflicted against the gravity of the attack.
Where the conditions are fully met, the defender is acquitted and no civil liability arises. Exceeding the limit through excitement, fear or panic attracts no punishment, while conscious excess leads to a reduced sentence. Defensive acts against attacks in homes and workplaces are where proportionality is most intensely contested in practice.
The glossary is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. What a term means in a specific case depends on the details of the file.
We have been informed that people are being contacted via SMS, WhatsApp and phone calls in the name of SLC Law, and asked for payments on the claim that a lawsuit or enforcement file exists against them.
Our firm never requests payments, bank transfers, passwords or personal/banking information via SMS, WhatsApp or phone. Please disregard such messages and do not click on any links they contain.
If you have received a suspicious message, you can verify it through our official contact channels and report it to the police or the Public Prosecutor's Office.